Adams signals support for a Gifted and Talented program admissions exam

Mayoral frontrunner Eric Adams said Wednesday that he supports a Gifted and Talented program admissions exam — leading some critics to question the impact and timing of Mayor de Blasio’s 11th-hour overhaul.

Hizzoner wants to nix any admissions test outright — but Adams said he backed some form of an entry exam during an appearance in Chelsea.

To this point, kids as young as 4 have taken a standardized test to get into the accelerated learning programs.

“That’s part of the conversation,” Adams said. “We’re going to sit down with parents teachers, educators. I have a great team that I’m meeting with and I see that the test should be still in place. Even if it means expanding or having children opt out. Let everyone take it.”

Adams stressed that eligibility for advanced programs should extend well beyond age 4 and that other Gifted and Talented reforms are necessary.

Mayoral candidate Eric Adams said he wants to create an admissions test for the city’s Gifted and Talented program.
James Messerschmidt for NY Post

“Four years old should not determine the rest of your educational career,” he said. “It should be ensuring  that we can do beyond four and continue to assess students for their needs.”

De Blasio’s vision would scrap any testing system and instead have teachers nominate advanced learners after the age of eight.

Advertisement

His proposal would ban separate classes based on aptitude and offer select kids advanced material within the general classroom setting. .

But with Adams — or Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa — in a position to reverse part or all of de Blasio’s last-minute plan, critics of the Gifted and Talented program said his exertions came too late.

Mayor Bill de Blasio recently announced that the city will begin phasing out the Gifted and Talented programs at  city public schools.
Mayor Bill de Blasio recently announced that the city will begin phasing out the Gifted and Talented programs at city public schools.
Stephen Yang for the NY Post

Brooklyn College and CUNY Grad Center education professor David Bloomfield, who backs getting rid of the current program, said City Hall should have acted long ago.

“His position on desegregation and Gifted and Talented has been slow and largely symbolic throughout the eight years,” he said. “So this is consistent. He has stirred the hornet’s nest while he walks away thinking somehow that this cements a legacy. The only legacy it cements is one of sluggishness and lack of commitment.”

Advertisement

But Bloomfield did say that de Blasio’s action disrupted the status quo and put his successor in a position of having to change policy.

A rally held in support of Gifted and Talented programs outside of Department of Education headquarters in Manhattan on October 12, 2021.
A rally held in support of Gifted and Talented programs outside of Department of Education headquarters in Manhattan on October 12, 2021.
Stephen Yang for the NY Post

Gifted and Talented program backers assert that advanced learners should have opportunities for accelerated instruction with peers of comparable ability.

They argue that it should be expanded and modified, but not eliminated.

Opponents argue that the system benefits those with superior means and perpetuates racial separation in city classrooms.

Advertisement